Which of the following best describes communication in the context of the National Use of Force Framework?

The aspect of communication that is best described in the context of the National Use of Force Framework is the use of verbal and non-verbal skills to engage with subjects. This framework emphasizes the importance of de-escalation and building rapport during interactions, particularly in high-stress situations. Effective communication can often prevent conflicts from escalating and can help facilitate cooperation from subjects, which is a cornerstone of a professional and measured approach to law enforcement.

Utilizing both verbal and non-verbal skills, officers can convey authority while also demonstrating empathy and understanding. This dual approach is crucial in assessing a situation, gauging the subject's state of mind, and determining the appropriate level of response needed. Good communication can promote trust and encourage compliance, negating the need for more forceful measures and contributing to positive outcomes in tense situations.

The other options, while related to force and control, do not capture the essence of the National Use of Force Framework's focus on communication as a proactive, engagement-oriented strategy. Physical restraints, forcing compliance, and ignoring cues move away from the interpersonal engagement that is central to effective law enforcement interactions as promoted by the framework.